blank
blank
blank

Free Product Info
Subscribe/About Us

The Latest On:
Campaigns
Agencies
The Law/Regulatory
Deals

Key Tactics
Event Marketing
Games, Contests
 & Sweeps

Premium Incentives/Gift Cards
Sampling
Coupons

Ask Us/Tell Us
Ask the PROMO Pro
Contact Editorial
Contact Sales

Be a Part of PROMO
PROMO Expo
PROMO 100
Pro Awards
EMMAs
Marketers of the Year

Resources
Reprints
Archives
Book List
Calendar
IMI Insight

Industry Links
PMA
MAAW
ANA
AAAA
EXCELeration Training

Related Links
Catalog Age
Direct
O & F
Special Events
Meetings Net
American Demographics
Retail Traffic
Primedia Corp.
blank

SEC Notifies Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay of Possible Civil Charges

PROMO, May 4 2004

Print-friendly format E-mail this information

cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0>
cellpadding=>

Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay may face civil action from U.S. regulators over improper dealings of close to $6 million in vendor allowances with Kmart, PepsiCo said last week.

The Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay divisions of PepsiCo received notification Friday that the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was recommending bringing a civil action against the divisions, Pepsi-Co said.

The SEC alleged that two non-executive employees, one at each division, signed documents in 2001 prepared by Kmart acknowledging payments of $3 million from Pepsi-Cola and $2.8 million from Frito-Lay. Kmart allegedly used the documents to improperly record the timing of the revenue from these businesses.

PepsiCo said that both Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay are cooperating with the investigation and plan to submit reasons why the civil action should not be recommended or brought.

PepsiCo released a statement that read in part: "Based on an internal review, no officers of PepsiCo, Pepsi-Cola or Frito-Lay are involved. The matter does not involve any allegations regarding PepsiCo's own accounting for its transactions with Kmart or PepsiCo's financial statements."

Kmart said that the improperly recorded vendor allowance transactions were part of an SEC and Department of Justice investigation completed in early 2003, prior to its emergence from bankruptcy in May 2003. Kmart said that based on the findings of the investigation, it had fired all employees responsible for the improper recording of the documents. It said that financial statements for fiscal 2001 and prior years were restated to correct the improperly recorded allowances.

In January, the SEC formally opened its investigation of Pepsi rival Coca-Cola over allegations raised by a former employee that the company tampered with a Burger King promotion. The upgraded investigation allowed the SEC to issue subpoenas and interview company officials. (Xtra, Jan. 20, 2004)

© 2008, Primedia Business Magazines and Media, a PRIMEDIA company. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, redisseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of PRIMEDIA Business Corp.

Get Copyright Clearance Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008, PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media Inc.

Print-friendly format E-mail this information
blank
blank
blank

PRO Awards:
Entries due by June 11

blank

Annual Report Sponsors












New Advertisers
This Month
blank

blank