blank
blank
blank

Free Product Info
Subscribe/About Us

The Latest On:
Campaigns
Agencies
The Law/Regulatory
Deals

Key Tactics
Event Marketing
Games, Contests
 & Sweeps

Premium Incentives/Gift Cards
Sampling
Coupons

Ask Us/Tell Us
Ask the PROMO Pro
Contact Editorial
Contact Sales

Be a Part of PROMO
PROMO Expo
PROMO 100
Pro Awards
EMMAs
Marketers of the Year

Resources
Reprints
Archives
Book List
Calendar
IMI Insight

Industry Links
PMA
MAAW
ANA
AAAA
EXCELeration Training

Related Links
Catalog Age
Direct
O & F
Special Events
Meetings Net
American Demographics
Retail Traffic
Primedia Corp.
blank

Major E-mail Providers Sue Hundreds Under Can Spam Act

PROMO Xtra, Mar 11 2004

Print-friendly format E-mail this information

cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0>
cellpadding=>

In the first action taken under the new federal Can Spam act, four of the nation's largest e-mail providers on Tuesday filed suit against hundreds of online marketers.

The lawsuits were filed by Microsoft Corp., Yahoo, Inc. EarthLink, Inc. and America Online, a unit of Time Warner, Inc. Six lawsuits were filed in federal courts in California, Virginia, Georgia and Washington state, according to news reports.

The suits cover a range of federal and state laws, including organized crime statutes, trespass and trademark infringement. The suit claims that the defendants falsified return addresses, used misleading subject lines and routed messages through other computers, the report said.

The Can Spam Act, passed last year, took effect Jan. 1. The measure establishes the first national standards for commercial e-mail and includes tough civil and criminal penalties. The Act requires senders of commercial e-mail to include an enforceable opt-out mechanism, prohibits false and deceptive headers and subject lines and increases monetary damages imposed on spammers who engage in particularly nefarious spamming techniques. The bill was sponsored by Sens. Conrad Burns (R-MT) and Ron Wyden (D-OR).

Last week, the Federal Trade Commission, which enforces the law, announced that it was seeking comment on how to define the criteria used to determine the "primary purpose" of an e-mail to clairfy whether the Act applies to certain e-mails. It is also seeking comment on establishing a nationwide do-not-e-mail registry, which a proposal in the Act encouraged the FTC to create.

The law is to be enforced by the FTC, state attorneys general and Internet service providers. Fines of up to $250 per e-mail with a cap of $2 million that can be tripled for aggravated violations can be imposed. Criminal provisions in the bill create several tiers of penalties, including up to five years in prison.

© 2008, Primedia Business Magazines and Media, a PRIMEDIA company. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, redisseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of PRIMEDIA Business Corp.

Get Copyright Clearance Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008, PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media Inc.

Print-friendly format E-mail this information
blank
blank
blank

PRO Awards:
Entries due by June 11

blank

Annual Report Sponsors












New Advertisers
This Month
blank

blank